By David Laing The poems of William Dunbar, now first collected. With notes, and a memoir of his life.

Неология

I a basic, here-a d- ow way she had fou d se sual sa isfac io (A.Hailey. Wheels, p.136) 2. Bu apar from ha , hey were highly i dividual, wi h a be ler- ha average spri kli g of ecee rics. (A.Hailey Wheels,p.60) 3. Amo g hem: experime s wi h ew cars, rucks, a d heir compo e s, as well as drive- o-des ruc io performa ce es s o curre models. (A.Hailey Wheels, p.92) 4. here was some hi g pre er a urally grave abou her, almos Vic oria (J.Fowles he Ebo y ower, p.37) 5. David William’s pare s were bo h archi ec e, a s ill prac ici g husba d-a d-wife eam of some re ow . (J.Fowles he Ebo y ower, p.42) 6. Her mome wi h i us was ow over, a d he cruel husba d-domi a ed ime whose slave she was had drive eve i us ou of her head. (I.Murdoch. he Sea! he Sea! p.272) 7. he i s ruc or ells a cock-a d-bull s ory abou he compa y .(A.Hailey Wheels, p.144). Итак, морфологические новообразования создаются в художественной прозе практически неограниченно. Однако, имея в основе общий структурный принцип, они резко различаются по степени коннотативности. Для сравнения можно дать следующие ряды суффиксальных новообразований, построенных на сходных словообразовательных моделях: 1. cres falle ess 2 subs a celess 3 big comer ordi ari ess lifeless imagi er ge le ess peerless i sider rou d ess imeless sleepwalker whi e ess guileless des royer brow ess wi dowless woma izer u worldli ess lipless seeker lumpi ess frouserless clu erer forgive ess charmless hooker grumpi ess speechless roublemaker Russia ess brai less E glish ess wi dless limi less cou less Очевидно, что названные новообразования отчетливо различаются по наличию-отсутствию в них коннетативности, стилистической окраски.